SAKURA:日本樱花VPS1G(大阪机房)测评

yqf.me之前也测评过樱花VPS的1G性能,还测评过樱花VPS的SSD1G性能,只是发布在另外其他的网站,为了保持此网站樱花VPS教程的完整性,今天特意重新开一个试用VPS,对樱花VPS进行简单的测评,仅供参考。

1、ssh登陆sakura,欢迎界面:

login as: root
root@49.212.193.44’s password:

SAKURA Internet [Virtual Private Server SERVICE]

2、默认的centos6_x86_64系统:

[root@www22270ue ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 6.4 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

系统内核:

[root@www22270ue ~]# uname -r
2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64

3、CPU型号查看,双核E5645,貌似是个高级货。

[root@www22270ue ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645


stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2399.906
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse3 6 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc unfair_spinlock pni ss se3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes hypervisor
bogomips : 4799.81
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2399.906
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse3 6 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc unfair_spinlock pni ss se3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes hypervisor
bogomips : 4799.81
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

4、内存1G。

[root@www22270ue ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 996 133 862 0 8 72
-/+ buffers/cache: 52 944
Swap: 2047 0 2047

5、磁盘100G。

[root@www22270ue ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda3 97G 1.6G 90G 2% /
tmpfs 499M 0 499M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/vda1 243M 50M 180M 22% /boot

6、磁盘性能测试。良好。

[root@www22270ue ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7.68197 s, 34.9 MB/s

7、网络入口带宽测试。(因为是测试机,日本樱花VPS官方限速2m,故暂不测试出口带宽,其实他家出口带宽也是长期跑满100Mbps的)

[root@www22270ue ~]# wget -c http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-03-17 17:03:02– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 20.1M/s in 5.0s

2013-03-17 17:03:07 (20.0 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

8、UnixBench跑分测试。1200多分,可见日本樱花VPS的机器是多么强劲。

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: www22270ue.sakura.ne.jp: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Wed Mar 13 00:26:49 UTC 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
17:28:10 up 35 min, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.01, 0.00; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 17 2013 17:28:10 – 17:56:02
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16626431.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1605.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1746.5 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 439365.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 132559.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 987067.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1209859.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 11327.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3936.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2940.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 559.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1560836.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16626431.6 1424.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1605.9 292.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 1746.5 406.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 439365.2 1109.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 132559.7 801.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 987067.2 1701.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1209859.2 972.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 11327.8 28.3
Process Creation 126.0 3936.4 312.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2940.8 693.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 559.0 931.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1560836.4 1040.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 581.0

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 17 2013 17:56:02 – 18:24:04
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34261789.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2768.4 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4494.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 596890.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 142454.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1451222.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1773327.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 295566.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9606.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4963.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 762.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2456880.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34261789.0 2935.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2768.4 503.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 4494.4 1045.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 596890.1 1507.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 142454.6 860.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1451222.7 2502.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1773327.3 1425.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 295566.9 738.9
Process Creation 126.0 9606.2 762.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4963.6 1170.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 762.8 1271.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2456880.6 1637.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1209.6

9、ping.chinaz.com节点测试ping。广东,四川,云南,深圳电信等局部电信稍微差点以外,总体情况良好,尤其是北京联通,常年是60-90的ping值。

最快:日本[海外] 毫秒    最慢:广东东莞[电信] 289 毫秒
电信平均: 169 毫秒    联通平均: 81 毫秒

Pinging 49.212.193.44 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 49.212.193.44: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=48
Reply from 49.212.193.44: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=48
Reply from 49.212.193.44: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=48
Reply from 49.212.193.44: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 49.212.193.44:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 93ms, Average = 92ms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *