kagoya:日本轿行VPS试用记录(A套餐:2G)

kagoya-vps

试试支持日付的日本VPS,本来是网友只买了1天的,后来我出差也忘记给删除了,今天刚好自己测测kagoya的VPS,看看性能咋样。

1、我选择的是centos6 32系统。

[root@v2975 ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

2、看看cpu,3核的,E5640,貌似不差。

[root@v2975 ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz


stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.765
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 32
initial apicid : 32
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr
sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc
aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes
lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.53
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.765
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr
sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc
aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes
lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.26
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.765
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 34
initial apicid : 34
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr
sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc
aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes
lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.53
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

3、内存2G突发,保证1G。

[root@v2975 ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 2048 22 2025 0 0 11
-/+ buffers/cache: 10 2037
Swap: 4096 0 4096

4、磁盘标准是200G,可以扩容到1000G。

[root@v2975 ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 1000G 604M 1000G 1% /
none 1.0G 4.0K 1.0G 1% /dev
none 1.0G 0 1.0G 0% /dev/shm

5、dd测试下磁盘IO性能,挺不错。

[root@v2975 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.46054 s, 77.6 MB/s

6、入口带宽测试,大概有50Mbps.

入口带宽,大概50Mbps.
[root@v2975 ~]# wget -c http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-03-29 14:34:30– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.testâ€

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 5.08M/s in 20s

2013-03-29 14:34:51 (4.98 MB/s) – “100mb.testâ€

以下是下载我日本樱花VPS上的iso文件,测kagoya入口带宽。

HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “win2003.isoâ€

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 6.47M/s in 1m 45s

2013-03-29 14:37:27 (6.21 MB/s) – “win2003.isoâ€

7、网络出口带宽测试,平均4.78MB/s,折算大概能跑满40Mbps的样子。

[root@www30335ue ~]# wget -c http://kagoya.yihost.net/2003.iso
–2013-03-29 17:55:15– http://kagoya.yihost.net/2003.iso
Resolving kagoya.yihost.net… 153.127.243.58
Connecting to kagoya.yihost.net|153.127.243.58|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 4.41M/s in 2m 17s

2013-03-29 17:57:32 (4.78 MB/s) – `2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

8、UnixBench跑分测试,可能和他家提供是是3核的CPU有关,UB跑分非常理想。

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: v2975.vir.kagoya.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab063.2 — #1 SMP Tue Oct 23 16:24:09 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
15:02:43 up 33 min, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 29 2013 15:02:43 – 15:30:50
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17666852.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2706.2 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3034.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 560240.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 147101.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1176257.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1416189.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 127699.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7154.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3270.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 944.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1581661.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17666852.5 1513.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2706.2 492.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 3034.6 705.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 560240.8 1414.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 147101.5 888.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176257.9 2028.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1416189.8 1138.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 127699.5 319.2
Process Creation 126.0 7154.8 567.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3270.9 771.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 944.5 1574.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1581661.1 1054.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 917.2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 29 2013 15:30:50 – 15:59:17
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33812398.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7340.6 MWIPS (9.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7909.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 465576.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 118150.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1228042.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2827323.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 402515.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 17847.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8188.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1105.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3126491.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33812398.8 2897.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7340.6 1334.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 7909.3 1839.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 465576.9 1175.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 118150.8 713.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1228042.4 2117.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2827323.1 2272.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 402515.0 1006.3
Process Creation 126.0 17847.6 1416.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8188.3 1931.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1105.2 1842.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3126491.1 2084.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1610.1

9、ping.chinaz.com测试超级ping。还是以北京联通为例,平均79ms。

Reply from 153.127.243.58: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=48
Reply from 153.127.243.58: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=48
Reply from 153.127.243.58: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=48
Reply from 153.127.243.58: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 153.127.243.58:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 79ms

kagoya-ping1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *