日本VPS之kagoya轿行VPS体验B套餐(6核4G)

kagoya-4g-8g

1、我选择的是centos5 32系统,最小化安装。

[root@v3922 ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

[root@v3922 ~]# uname -r
2.6.32-042stab061.2

2、看看cpu,6核的,E5640,貌似不差。

[root@v3922 ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 4

vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz


stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.823
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 8
core id : 9
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 50
initial apicid : 50
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdt scp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmp erf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.64
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 5
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.823
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 9
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 18
initial apicid : 18
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdt scp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmp erf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.25
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

3、内存4G突发,保证2G。

[root@v3922 ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4096 44 4051 0 0 6
-/+ buffers/cache: 37 4058
Swap: 8192 0 8192

4、磁盘标准是400G,可以扩容到1000G。

[root@v3922 ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 1000G 424M 1000G 1% /
none 2.0G 4.0K 2.0G 1% /dev
5、dd测试下磁盘IO性能,挺不错。

[root@v3922 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.3464 seconds, 50.2 MB/s

6、入口带宽测试,入口带宽,大概50Mbps.

[root@v3922 ~]# wget -c http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-04-28 17:02:40– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 5.92M/s in 17s

2013-04-28 17:02:58 (5.89 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

以下是下载我日本樱花VPS上的iso文件,测kagoya入口带宽。

HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 5.99M/s in 1m 48s

2013-04-28 17:05:26 (6.08 MB/s) – `win2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

7、网络出口带宽测试,平均3.32MB/s,折算大概能跑满30Mbps的样子。

[unixftp@www30335ue ~]$ wget -c http://kag4g.yihost.net/win2003.iso
–2013-04-28 18:45:33– http://kag4g.yihost.net/win2003.iso
Resolving kag4g.yihost.net… 153.127.247.13
Connecting to kag4g.yihost.net|153.127.247.13|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 2.88M/s in 3m 17s

2013-04-28 18:48:51 (3.32 MB/s) – `win2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

8、UnixBench跑分测试,可能和他家提供是是6核的CPU有关,UB跑分非常理想2000多分。

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: v3922.vir.kagoya.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab061.2 — #1 SMP Fri Aug 24 09:07:21 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
17:13:36 up 18 min, 1 user, load average: 0.28, 0.10, 0.03; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 28 2013 17:13:36 – 17:41:17
6 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 11178218.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2293.9 MWIPS (8.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2370.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 488898.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 152871.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1116114.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1205664.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 88379.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5240.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3667.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1461.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1473552.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 11178218.2 957.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2293.9 417.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 2370.4 551.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 488898.9 1234.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 152871.7 923.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1116114.9 1924.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1205664.1 969.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 88379.0 220.9
Process Creation 126.0 5240.3 415.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3667.6 865.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1461.1 2435.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1473552.0 982.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 817.5

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 28 2013 17:41:17 – 18:09:37
6 CPUs in system; running 6 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43100959.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12118.8 MWIPS (9.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11829.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 353769.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 94980.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1014822.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4954745.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 600757.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 24960.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12624.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1845.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3843225.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43100959.5 3693.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12118.8 2203.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 11829.6 2751.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 353769.9 893.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 94980.0 573.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1014822.2 1749.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4954745.7 3982.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 600757.4 1501.9
Process Creation 126.0 24960.3 1981.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12624.5 2977.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1845.5 3075.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3843225.5 2562.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2052.3
9、ping.chinaz.com测试超级ping。还是以北京联通为例,平均80ms。

Pinging 153.127.247.13 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 153.127.247.13: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=47
Reply from 153.127.247.13: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=47
Reply from 153.127.247.13: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=47
Reply from 153.127.247.13: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 153.127.247.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 82ms, Average = 80ms

kagoya-ping-4g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *