体验12核8G的kagoya日本VPS之轿行VPS套餐C

kagoya-4g-8g

 

1、我选择的是centos5 32系统,最小化安装。

[root@v3923 ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

[root@v3923 ~]# uname -r
2.6.32-042stab061.2

2、看看cpu,12核的,E5640,貌似不差。

processor : 10
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz


stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.823
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 35
initial apicid : 35
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdt scp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmp erf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.64
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 11
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2666.823
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 3
initial apicid : 3
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdt scp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmp erf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5333.25
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

3、内存8G突发,保证4G。

[root@v3923 ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 8192 44 8147 0 0 7
-/+ buffers/cache: 37 8154
Swap: 16384 0 16384

4、磁盘标准是800G,可以扩容到1000G。

Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 1000G 424M 1000G 1% /
none 4.0G 4.0K 4.0G 1% /dev

5、dd测试下磁盘IO性能,挺不错。

[root@v3923 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.77216 seconds, 56.3 MB/s

6、入口带宽测试,入口带宽,大概50Mbps.

[root@v3923 ~]# wget -c http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-04-28 17:29:36– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 5.79M/s in 18s

2013-04-28 17:29:54 (5.59 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

以下是下载我日本樱花VPS上的iso文件,测kagoya入口带宽。

HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 5.91M/s in 1m 51s

2013-04-28 17:32:54 (5.89 MB/s) – `win2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

7、网络出口带宽测试,晚上高峰时刻测试,平均2.13MB/s,折算大概能跑满20Mbps的样子。

[unixftp@www30335ue ~]$ wget -c http://kag8g.yihost.net/win2003.iso
–2013-04-28 23:29:42– http://kag8g.yihost.net/win2003.iso
Resolving kag8g.yihost.net… 153.127.247.14
Connecting to kag8g.yihost.net|153.127.247.14|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

100%[======================================>] 686,127,104 2.35M/s in 5m 7s

2013-04-28 23:34:49 (2.13 MB/s) – `win2003.iso’ saved [686127104/686127104]

8、UnixBench跑分测试,可能和他家提供是是12核的CPU有关,UB跑分非常理想,近3000分。是我测试所有VPS里面UnixBench跑分最高的一款VPS了,kagoya硬件也不错。

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: v3923.vir.kagoya.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab061.2 — #1 SMP Fri Aug 24 09:07:21 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @ 2.67GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
17:43:37 up 22 min, 1 user, load average: 0.15, 0.08, 0.02; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 28 2013 17:43:37 – 18:11:17
12 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10968288.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2298.0 MWIPS (8.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2281.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 347120.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 112038.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 904510.3 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1082673.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 97514.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5244.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3126.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1773.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1378727.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10968288.7 939.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2298.0 417.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2281.5 530.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 347120.4 876.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112038.8 677.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 904510.3 1559.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1082673.9 870.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 97514.7 243.8
Process Creation 126.0 5244.6 416.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3126.5 737.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1773.2 2955.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1378727.4 919.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 754.6

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 28 2013 18:11:17 – 18:39:55
12 CPUs in system; running 12 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 65983524.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 24821.5 MWIPS (9.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 18961.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 346811.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 94675.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1051708.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 6584006.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1075542.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 40090.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20973.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3549.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4854430.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 65983524.5 5654.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 24821.5 4513.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 18961.1 4409.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 346811.7 875.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 94675.1 572.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1051708.7 1813.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6584006.5 5292.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1075542.8 2688.9
Process Creation 126.0 40090.7 3181.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20973.5 4946.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3549.9 5916.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4854430.7 3236.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2952.3

9、ping.chinaz.com测试超级ping。还是以北京联通为例,平均81ms。

Pinging 153.127.247.14 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 153.127.247.14: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=48
Reply from 153.127.247.14: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=48
Reply from 153.127.247.14: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=48
Reply from 153.127.247.14: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 153.127.247.14:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 86ms, Average = 81ms

kagoya-ping-8g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *