日本vps之GMOcloud最低配2G测试

gmo-vps-0

GMO旗下的VPS品牌很多,比如新开的Conoha云主机,支持多IP;比如之前的Onamae,名前VPS,还有至少2个品牌也是GMO集团下的,就不再一一列举了。今天来测试的是GMO云主机,gmocloud,最低配,2G内存,100G磁盘,3核CPU。

1、看看默认的系统:

[root@sub0000526313 ~]# cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m

[root@sub0000526313 ~]# uname -r
2.6.18-194.17.4.el5

2、看看CPU情况:

[root@sub0000526313 ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 2133.458
cache size : 32 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni
bogomips : 4266.91
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 2133.458
cache size : 32 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni
bogomips : 4269.29
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 2133.458
cache size : 32 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni
bogomips : 4268.70
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

3、内存2G,swap是1G:

[root@sub0000526313 ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 2010 181 1829 0 7 118
-/+ buffers/cache: 55 1955
Swap: 1023 0 1023

4、磁盘是100G。

[root@sub0000526313 ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 98G 1.3G 92G 2% /
tmpfs 1006M 0 1006M 0% /dev/shm

5、dd测试下磁盘IO性能。

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 50.1074 seconds, 5.4 MB/s

6、入口带宽测试,或许是试用机,入口带宽明显做了限制,测试入口带宽大概5Mbps的样子。

Connecting to my.rbvps.com|49.212.213.109|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 686127104 (654M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `win2003.iso’

13% [==========> ] 94,173,340 465K/s eta 17m 20s

7、出口带宽测试,从樱花VPS下载GMO云主机上的iso文件,得到GMO的出口带宽大概有40Mbps。

[unixftp@www29353ue home]$ wget -c http://gmo.yihost.net/jp.win2008r2.64.virtio.iso
–2013-08-17 17:49:33– http://gmo.yihost.net/jp.win2008r2.64.virtio.iso
Resolving gmo.yihost.net… 153.122.19.224
Connecting to gmo.yihost.net|153.122.19.224|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 131425999 (125M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `jp.win2008r2.64.virtio.iso’

100%[======================================>] 131,425,999 4.65M/s in 28s

2013-08-17 17:50:01 (4.52 MB/s) – `jp.win2008r2.64.virtio.iso’ saved [131425999/131425999]

8、UnixBench跑分测试,1400分,算比较给力的了。

 ========================================================================

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: sub0000526313.hmk-temp.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 — #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 15:50:53 EDT 2010
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (4266.9 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (4269.3 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (4268.7 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
18:05:12 up 1:06, 1 user, load average: 1.19, 0.43, 0.27; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 17 2013 18:05:12 – 18:33:42
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12986734.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2441.2 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2424.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 521071.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 142496.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1091327.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 982165.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 108052.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8174.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4795.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1672.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 844785.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12986734.2 1112.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2441.2 443.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2424.1 563.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 521071.1 1315.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 142496.7 861.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1091327.4 1881.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 982165.4 789.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 108052.9 270.1
Process Creation 126.0 8174.7 648.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4795.3 1131.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1672.4 2787.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 844785.1 563.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 851.8

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 17 2013 18:33:42 – 19:01:51
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38556685.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7267.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8776.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 159247.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 39747.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 395301.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2840961.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 780994.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 24639.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12204.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1774.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2047615.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38556685.1 3303.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7267.9 1321.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 8776.5 2041.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 159247.4 402.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39747.3 240.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 395301.2 681.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2840961.1 2283.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 780994.2 1952.5
Process Creation 126.0 24639.1 1955.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12204.4 2878.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1774.4 2957.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2047615.4 1365.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1405.5

9、ping.chinaz.com测试超级ping.

gmo-vps-2

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *